The construction of the new female identity in Virginia Woolf's To the lighthouse and Margaret Laurence's A jest of god
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Literature has always been a discrete area for women through which they express their hopes, desires and fears. The female character has long been associated with the usual strict stereotypes as passive, irrational, weak and compassionate. They have always been seen as the weakest sex in need of a savior, restricting their function to being saved rather than rescuing others. This study deals with two novels published in the 20th century, Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse (1927) and Margaret Laurence’s A Jest of God (1966) whose heroines are a good example of the new female who fights to construct her new identity in two different countries, England and Canada. Woolf recognizes that women have been prohibited from society and from writing in their own voice. Thus, To the Lighthouse constitutes a feminist analysis of the rejection of women from education and economic independence. At that time, marriage, divorce and child custody were of great importance, which explains the attitude of the male characters towards the artist Lily Briscoe, a spinster.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".