Evaluation of Various Deep Learning Algorithms for Landslide and Sinkhole Detection from UAV Imagery in a Semi-arid Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sinkholes and landslides occur due to soil collapse in different slope types, often triggered by heavy rainfall, presenting challenges in the semi-arid Golestan province, Iran. This study primarily focuses on the detection of these phenomena. Recent advancements in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) image acquisition and the incorporation of deep learning (DL) algorithms have enabled the creation of semi-automated methods for highly detailed soil landform detection across large areas. In this study, we explored the efficacy of six state-of-the-art deep learning segmentation algorithms—DeepLab-v3+, Link-Net, MA-Net, PSP-Net, ResU-Net, and SQ-Net—applied to UAV-derived datasets for mapping landslides and sinkholes. Our most promising outcomes demonstrated the successful mapping of landslides with an F1-Score of 0.95% and sinkholes with an F1-Score of 89% in a challenging environment. ResUNet exhibited an outstanding Precision of 0.97 and Recall of 0.92, culminating in the highest F1-Score of 0.95, indicating the best landslide detection model. MA-Net and SQ-Net resulted in the highest F1-Score for sinkhole detection. Our study underscores the significant impact of DL segmentation algorithm selection on the accuracy of landslide and sinkhole detection tasks. By leveraging DL segmentation algorithms, the accuracy of both landslide and sinkhole detection tasks can be significantly improved, promoting better hazard management and enhancing the safety of the affected areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it