The Interplay of Supply Chain Integration and Marketing Strategies in Achieving Customer Satisfaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the dynamic interplay between supply chain integration and marketing strategies in achieving customer satisfaction. Through a qualitative approach involving semi-structured interviews with supply chain and marketing professionals, the research delves into how these traditionally distinct functions can be aligned to enhance operational efficiency and deliver superior customer experiences. Findings reveal that strategic alignment between supply chain management (SCM) and marketing fosters better coordination of product availability and service delivery, thereby meeting customer expectations consistently and enhancing brand loyalty. Information sharing and technological integration emerge as critical enablers, facilitating real-time data exchange and collaborative decision-making. The study also identifies challenges such as organizational silos, cultural resistance, and technological constraints that impede seamless integration, highlighting the need for proactive strategies to foster cross-functional collaboration. Additionally, the evolving roles of sustainability and customer-centricity are emphasized as key drivers for differentiating brands and achieving competitive advantage. By integrating sustainable practices and adopting a customer-centric approach, organizations can build stronger customer relationships and enhance their market position. The research underscores the importance of leadership support, investment in technology, and a collaborative organizational culture in overcoming integration barriers. The study’s findings provide actionable insights for organizations aiming to optimize their SCM and marketing strategies, drive innovation, and sustain growth in an increasingly complex and competitive business environment. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on supply chain and marketing integration, offering practical recommendations for achieving customer satisfaction and long-term success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".