Myocardial flow reserve recovery in patients with Takotsubo syndrome: insights from positron emission tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Positron emission tomography (PET) plays a key role in the assessment of CMD through myocardial flow reserve (MFR). However, there is limited information on the temporal progression of MFR and its relationship to coronary artery disease (CAD) in TTS patients. Methods This study evaluated patients with TTS who underwent cardiac catheterization and PET within one year of hospitalization. Patients were categorized into acute (≤10 days), subacute (11-30 days), and chronic (≥31 days) stages based on post-onset time of PET assessment. MFR comparisons between stages, prevalence of abnormal MFR (<2.0), and MFR changes with or without obstructive CAD (≥70% stenosis as per coronary angiography) were analyzed. Results Of the 88 patients studied (mean age 70; 96% female), 52 (59%) were in the acute, 17 (19%) in the subacute, and 19 (22%) in the chronic stage. Median MFR in the acute stage was 2.0 (1.5-2.3), with 58% of patients showing abnormal MFR. A significant time-dependent improvement in MFR was observed (p=0.002) (Figure A), accompanied by a decreased prevalence of abnormal MFR. Patients with obstructive CAD in the acute stage had a significantly lower MFR compared to patients without CAD (1.81 vs. 2.15, p=0.027), while no MFR improvement was observed in the subacute and chronic stages (p=0.346) (Figure B). Conclusions PET-derived MFR was impaired in TTS patients during the acute phase, with improvement suggesting potential recovery from CMD over time. The concurrent presence of obstructive CAD might impede this recovery process. Figure B
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".