MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400103961 · doi:10.14740/jh1278

Venous Thromboembolism Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Hereditary Protein S Deficiency

2024· article· en· W4400103961 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Molly Rayner, Kelsey Brose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Vaccination2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirus InfectionsImmunologyVirologyPathologyDiseaseOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency is a rare condition associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted development of vaccinations to protect against the virus. PS deficiency is not a contraindication to COVID-19 vaccinations, but there are no studies regarding potential adverse effects in this population. We report two cases, a 43-year-old mother and her 18-year-old son, who developed VTE shortly after their first COVID-19 vaccines. Testing confirmed hereditary PS deficiency with a previously undescribed mutation in both cases. The temporal association between COVID-19 vaccination and VTE in these patients with hereditary PS deficiency suggests a potential causal relationship. However, it is unclear if this applies to all patients with hereditary PS deficiency. This highlights the importance of reporting adverse events following COVID-19 vaccinations in this population to evaluate the risks and benefits of vaccination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207