The Effect of Creative Visual Art Therapy on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: A Literature Review (L’effet de la thérapie créative par les arts visuels sur la tension artérielle et la fréquence cardiaque : une revue de la littérature)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of creative art therapy (CAT) on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) have been scarcely examined. The objective of this study was to summarize the current literature examining the effects of CAT on BP and HR. A systematic review was completed using the databases Pubmed, Medline, and Embase. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria of the database search. One paper found an association with reduced BP, three found an association with reduced HR, four found an association with increased heart rate variability (HRV), and one found a decrease in respiratory sinus arrhythmia that is associated with an increase in HR. Additionally, two more papers that involved looking at art rather than making art are discussed, accounting for those who have reduced ability to engage in art making. The specific art modality used was also shown to affect efficacy. The effect of CAT on cardiovascular parameters remains conflicting. Most papers examined in this review present promising findings of increased heart rate variability, and reduced BP and HR. Nevertheless, other papers found conflicting effects on cardiovascular parameters. As such, further studies should be conducted to resolve the inconsistent findings in this field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".