MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400113450 · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020368

Generalized Quantum Signal Processing

2024· article· en· W4400113450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRX Quantum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsQuantumQuantum computerAlgorithmMathematicsQuantum algorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Pure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceAlgebra over a fieldPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum signal processing (QSP) and quantum singular value transformation (QSVT) currently stand as the most efficient techniques for implementing functions of block-encoded matrices, a central task that lies at the heart of most prominent quantum algorithms. However, current QSP approaches face several challenges, such as the restrictions imposed on the family of achievable polynomials and the difficulty of calculating the required phase angles for specific transformations. In this paper, we present a generalized quantum signal processing (GQSP) approach, employing general SU(2) rotations as our signal-processing operators, rather than relying solely on rotations in a single basis. Our approach lifts all practical restrictions on the family of achievable transformations, with the sole remaining condition being that <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">|</a:mo></a:mrow><a:mi>P</a:mi><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">|</a:mo></a:mrow><a:mo>≤</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn></a:math>, a restriction necessary due to the unitary nature of quantum computation. Furthermore, GQSP provides a straightforward recursive formula for determining the rotation angles needed to construct the polynomials in cases where <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><f:mi>P</f:mi></f:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><i:mi>Q</i:mi></i:math> are known. In cases where only <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><l:mi>P</l:mi></l:math> is known, we provide an efficient optimization algorithm capable of identifying in under a minute of GPU time, a corresponding <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><o:mi>Q</o:mi></o:math> for polynomials of degree on the order of <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mn>7</r:mn></r:msup></r:math>. We further illustrate GQSP simplifies QSP-based strategies for Hamiltonian simulation, offer an optimal solution to the <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><u:mi>ϵ</u:mi></u:math>-approximate fractional query problem that requires <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><x:mrow><x:mi mathvariant="script">O</x:mi></x:mrow><x:mrow><x:mo>(</x:mo><x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo><x:mn>1</x:mn><x:mo>/</x:mo><x:mi>δ</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo><x:mo>+</x:mo><x:mi>log</x:mi><x:mo></x:mo><x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo><x:mn>1</x:mn><x:mo>/</x:mo><x:mi>ϵ</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo><x:mo>)</x:mo></x:mrow></x:math> queries to perform where <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><fb:mrow><fb:mi mathvariant="script">O</fb:mi></fb:mrow><fb:mo stretchy="false">(</fb:mo><fb:mn>1</fb:mn><fb:mo>/</fb:mo><fb:mi>δ</fb:mi><fb:mo stretchy="false">)</fb:mo></fb:math> is a proved lower bound, and introduces novel approaches for implementing bosonic operators. Moreover, we propose a novel framework for the implementation of normal matrices, demonstrating its applicability through synthesis of diagonal matrices, as well as the development of a new algorithm for convolution through synthesis of circulant matrices using only <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><lb:mrow><lb:mi mathvariant="script">O</lb:mi></lb:mrow><lb:mo stretchy="false">(</lb:mo><lb:mi>d</lb:mi><lb:mi>log</lb:mi><lb:mo></lb:mo><lb:mi>N</lb:mi><lb:mo>+</lb:mo><lb:msup><lb:mi>log</lb:mi><lb:mn>2</lb:mn></lb:msup><lb:mo></lb:mo><lb:mi>N</lb:mi><lb:mo stretchy="false">)</lb:mo></lb:math> 1 and 2-qubit gates for a filter of lengths <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><rb:mi>d</rb:mi></rb:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it