Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pedrycz shadowed sets are three-way approximations of fuzzy sets by transforming the infinite levels of fuzzy set membership grades in the unit interval [ 0 , 1 ] into three levels. The three levels represent qualitatively the sets of the white, grey, and black members of a shadowed set. In this paper, we generalize the notion of shadowed sets to the case of L-fuzzy sets by making three new contributions. First, we consider two representations of a shadowed set. One is a three-valued L-fuzzy set and the other is three pairwise disjoint sets. Second, we introduce two methods for constructing a shadowed set. One divides a finite lattice based on the notion of a pair of a set of designated core membership grades and a set of designated null membership grades. The other uses a pair of threshold sets, which generalizes the method that uses a pair of thresholds. We study formal properties of the two methods and show that they are equivalent. Finally, based on a distance function on a lattice, we present a simple method to build the sets of designated core and null membership grades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".