MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400118135 · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100991

Suicide-related internet use among mental health patients who died by suicide in the UK: a national clinical survey with case–control analysis

2024· article· en· W4400118135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealthcare Quality Improvement PartnershipMedical Research CouncilGambling Research Exchange OntarioNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchPatient Safety Translational Research CentreDepartment for Education, UK GovernmentNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
KeywordsMental healthThe InternetPsychiatrySuicide preventionMedicineOccupational safety and healthPopulationPoison controlMedical emergencyPsychologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Suicide-related internet use (SRIU) has been shown to be linked to suicide. However, there is limited research on SRIU among mental health patients, who are at 4 to 7 times increased risk of suicide compared to the general population. This study aims to address this gap by exploring the prevalence of SRIU among mental health patients who died by suicide in the UK and describing their characteristics. Methods: The study was carried out as part of the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH). Data were collected on sociodemographic, clinical, suicide characteristics and engagement in SRIU of patients who died by suicide between 2011 and 2021. The study utilised a case-control design to compare patients who engaged in suicide-related internet use with those who did not. Findings: The presence or absence of SRIU was known for 9875/17,347 (57%) patients; SRIU was known to be present in 759/9875 (8%) patients. The internet was most often used to obtain information on suicide methods (n = 523/759, 69%) and to visit pro-suicide websites (n = 250/759, 33%) with a significant overlap between the two (n = 152/759, 20%). Engaging in SRIU was present across all age groups. The case-control element of the study showed patients who were known to have engaged in SRIU were more likely to have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.43-3.18), have a history of childhood abuse (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.36-2.13) and to have received psychological treatment (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74) than controls. Additionally, these patients were more likely to have died on or near a salient date (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.61-2.76), such as a birthday or anniversary. Interpretation: The findings affirm SRIU as a feature of suicide among patients of all ages and highlight that clinicians should inquire about SRIU during assessments. Importantly, as the most common type of SRIU can expand knowledge on suicide means, clinicians need to be aware of the association between SRIU and choice of methods. This may be particularly relevant for patients approaching a significant calendar event. Funding: The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it