Business Model Evolution in the Age of NFTs and the Metaverse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamic progression of technology has induced a profound metamorphosis within the realm of commerce, ushering in novel prospects and trials for enterprises spanning diverse sectors. In contemporary times, the rise in non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and the conception of the Metaverse have ensnared the focus of corporate entities and visionary proprietors alike. This article explores the transformation of business frameworks during the era of NFTs and the Metaverse. It delves into traditional paradigms, clarifies the unique characteristics of NFTs, and examines their potential impacts on commerce. This article investigates the convergence of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and blockchain technology within the Metaverse. To investigate these transformations, this study undertakes a comprehensive literature evaluation. The findings highlight how NFTs and the Metaverse have introduced new avenues for generating revenue and creating value. These advancements are achieved through the utilization of smart contracts and adaptable strategies that cater to evolving consumer behaviors. This article also addresses significant challenges in this landscape and provides a forward-looking perspective on the anticipated trajectory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".