Intra-hospital microbiome variability is driven by accessibility and clinical activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hospital environmental microbiome, which can affect patients' and healthcare workers' health, is highly variable and the drivers of this variability are not well understood. In this study, we collected 37 surface samples from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in an inpatient hospital before and after the operation began. Additionally, healthcare workers collected 160 surface samples from five additional areas of the hospital. All samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the samples collected by healthcare workers were cultured. The NICU samples exhibited similar alpha and beta diversities before and after opening, which indicated that the microbiome there was stable over time. Conversely, the diversities of samples taken after opening varied widely by area. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed the samples clustered into two distinct groups: high alpha diversity [the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), pathology lab, and microbiology lab] and low alpha diversity [the NICU, pediatric surgery ward, and infection prevention and control (IPAC) office]. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classification models identified 156 informative amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) for predicting the sample's area of origin. The testing accuracy ranged from 86.37% to 100%, which outperformed linear and radial support vector machine (SVM) and random forest models. ASVs of genera that contain emerging pathogens were identified in these models. Culture experiments had identified viable species among the samples, including potential antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Though area type differences were not noted in the culture data, the prevalences and relative abundances of genera detected positively correlated with 16S sequencing data. This study brings to light the microbial community temporal and spatial variation within the hospital and the importance of pathogenic and commensal bacteria to understanding dispersal patterns for infection control. IMPORTANCE: We sampled surface samples from a newly built inpatient hospital in multiple areas, including areas accessed by only healthcare workers. Our analysis of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) showed that the microbiome was stable before and after the operation began, possibly due to access restrictions. Of the high-touch samples taken after opening, areas with high diversity had more potential external seeds (long-term patients and clinical samples), and areas with low diversity and had fewer (short-term or newborn patients). Classification models performed at high accuracy and identified biomarkers that could be used for more targeted surveillance and infection control. Though culturing data yielded viability and antibiotic-resistance information, it disproportionately detected the presence of genera relative to 16S data. This difference reinforces the utility of 16S sequencing in profiling hospital microbiomes. By examining the microbiome over time and in multiple areas, we identified potential drivers of the microbial variation within a hospital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".