MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400119475 · doi:10.1128/aem.00227-24

Development of a logic regression-based approach for the discovery of host- and niche-informative biomarkers in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and their application for microbial source tracking

2024· article· en· W4400119475 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Yu, Martin Andersson-Li, Sharon Maes, Lili Li, Norman F. Neumann, Monica Odlare, Anders Jönsson

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsBiologyIntergenic regionComputational biologyRange (aeronautics)Host (biology)Escherichia coliGeneticsGenomeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Microbial source tracking leverages a wide range of approaches designed to trace the origins of fecal contamination in aquatic environments. Although source tracking methods are typically employed within the laboratory setting, computational techniques can be leveraged to advance microbial source tracking methodology. Herein, we present a logic regression-based supervised learning approach for the discovery of source-informative genetic markers within intergenic regions across the Escherichia coli genome that can be used for source tracking. With just single intergenic loci, logic regression was able to identify highly source-specific (i.e., exceeding 97.00%) biomarkers for a wide range of host and niche sources, with sensitivities reaching as high as 30.00%–50.00% for certain source categories, including pig, sheep, mouse, and wastewater, depending on the specific intergenic locus analyzed. Restricting the source range to reflect the most prominent zoonotic sources of E. coli transmission (i.e., bovine, chicken, human, and pig) allowed for the generation of informative biomarkers for all host categories, with specificities of at least 90.00% and sensitivities between 12.50% and 70.00%, using the sequence data from key intergenic regions, including emrKY–evgAS , ibsB–(mdtABCD-baeSR), ompC–rcsDB, and yedS–yedR , that appear to be involved in antibiotic resistance. Remarkably, we were able to use this approach to classify 48 out of 113 river water E. coli isolates collected in Northwestern Sweden as either beaver, human, or reindeer in origin with a high degree of consensus—thus highlighting the potential of logic regression modeling as a novel approach for augmenting current source tracking efforts. IMPORTANCE The presence of microbial contaminants, particularly from fecal sources, within water poses a serious risk to public health. The health and economic burden of waterborne pathogens can be substantial—as such, the ability to detect and identify the sources of fecal contamination in environmental waters is crucial for the control of waterborne diseases. This can be accomplished through microbial source tracking, which involves the use of various laboratory techniques to trace the origins of microbial pollution in the environment. Building on current source tracking methodology, we describe a novel workflow that uses logic regression, a supervised machine learning method, to discover genetic markers in Escherichia coli , a common fecal indicator bacterium, that can be used for source tracking efforts. Importantly, our research provides an example of how the rise in prominence of machine learning algorithms can be applied to improve upon current microbial source tracking methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Environmental MicrobiologySame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207