Robust Truck Transit Time Prediction through GPS Data and Regression Algorithms in Mixed Traffic Scenarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To enhance safety and efficiency in mixed traffic scenarios, it is crucial to predict freight truck traffic flow accurately. Issues arise due to the interactions between freight trucks and passenger vehicles, leading to problems like traffic congestion and accidents. Utilizing data from the Global Positioning System (GPS) is a practical method to enhance comprehension and forecast the movement of truck traffic. This study primarily focuses on predicting truck transit time, which involves accurately estimating the duration it will take for a truck to travel between two locations. Precise forecasting has significant implications for truck scheduling and urban planning, particularly in the context of cross-docking terminals. Regression algorithms are beneficial in this scenario due to the empirical evidence confirming their efficacy. This study aims to achieve accurate travel time predictions for trucks by utilizing GPS data and regression algorithms. This research utilizes a variety of algorithms, including AdaBoost, GradientBoost, XGBoost, ElasticNet, Lasso, KNeighbors, Linear, LinearSVR, and RandomForest. The research provides a comprehensive assessment and discussion of important performance metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R-squared (R2). Based on our research findings, combining empirical methods, algorithmic knowledge, and performance evaluation helps to enhance truck travel time prediction. This has significant implications for logistical efficiency and transportation dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".