MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400122044 · doi:10.2166/9781789063059_0001

Introduction to urban drainage asset management: if something exciting happens, we've done it wrong!

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400122044 on OpenAlex
Frédéric Cherqui, F.H.L.R. Clemens, Bert van Duin, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIWA Publishing eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsset (computer security)DrainageSustainabilityAsset managementEngineering ethicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental ethicsEngineeringManagement sciencePolitical scienceGeographyComputer scienceBusinessPhilosophyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter introduces urban drainage (UD) asset management (AM) emphasizing on the scientific and practical developments over the past few decades. The book collates experiences from scientists and practitioners from around the world. A brief historical overview is provided outlining the journey from the urge for a broad application of UD systems in the 19th century born out of the awareness of public health, to the emergence of the necessity to embrace concepts as sustainability and the application of relatively new approaches that incorporate ‘building with nature’. The complexity of the tasks related to AM of urban drainage systems is briefly outlined along with an overview of the content of the remaining chapters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it