MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400123629 · doi:10.1002/9781394204472.ch7

IoT‐Based Railway Logistics

2024· other· en· W4400123629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceTransport engineeringEngineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve and optimise logistical operations, the railway sector is integrating Internet of Things (IoT) technology and systems. Real-time data is collected, sent, and analysed throughout the railway logistics process via linked equipment, sensors, data analytics, and communication networks. Various parts and systems of the rail infrastructure are outfitted with IoT sensors and devices for IoT-based railway logistics. These sensors can keep watch on and record data on the train's whereabouts, its speed, the temperature, the state of the cargo, and any necessary repairs. A central management system or cloud-based system will subsequently get the collected data for analysis and decision-making. IoT-based railway logistics promises to improve efficiency, safety, and dependability in railway logistics operations by using real-time data, connections, and intelligent decision-making skills. By boosting customer happiness, lowering costs, and improving operational efficiency, it has the potential to completely change the railway sector. To secure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data and systems, a number of security concerns and difficulties related to railway logistics must be addressed. These include security flaws on the internet: Railway logistics IoT systems and devices are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks such as malware, hacking, and unauthorised access. These devices can serve as entry points for cyberattacks since they are networked and connected to the internet, which might interrupt operations, compromise data, or endanger users’ safety. Railway logistics IoT devices produce and send a large quantity of data, including train movements, freight details, and maintenance logs. It is essential to protect this data and maintain privacy and prevent unauthorised entry. Both IoT devices and railway infrastructure are susceptible to physical assaults, vandalism, and manipulation. Critical components are physically accessed by unauthorised people. A possible point of vulnerability is the connection of IoT devices to the underlying network infrastructure. Strong security practices and methods must be put in place to handle these security issues. The primary object of this chapter is to focus on IoT-based railway logistics and security issues and challenges. Our studies will help the railway industry and new researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207