A structural perspective of how T cell receptors recognize the CD1 family of lipid antigen–presenting molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CD1 family of antigen-presenting molecules adopt a major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) fold. Whereas MHC molecules present peptides, the CD1 family has evolved to bind self- and foreign-lipids. The CD1 family of antigen-presenting molecules comprises four members-CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, and CD1d-that differ in their architecture around the lipid-binding cleft, thereby enabling diverse lipids to be accommodated. These CD1-lipid complexes are recognized by T cell receptors (TCRs) expressed on T cells, either through dual recognition of CD1 and lipid or in a new model whereby the TCR directly contacts CD1, thereby triggering an immune response. Chemical syntheses of lipid antigens, and analogs thereof, have been crucial in understanding the underlying specificity of T cell-mediated lipid immunity. This review will focus on our current understanding of how TCRs interact with CD1-lipid complexes, highlighting how it can be fundamentally different from TCR-MHC-peptide corecognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".