MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400136005 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.14889

Impact of Cannabidiol on Myocardial Recovery in Patients with Acute Myocarditis: Rationale & Design of the ARCHER Trial

2024· article· en· W4400136005 on OpenAlexafffund
Dennis M. McNamara, Leslie T. Cooper, Yaron Arbel, Arvind Bhimaraj, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Matthias G. Friedrich, Matthieu Kerneis, Peter P. Liu, Andrea B. Parker, Eldon R. Smith, W.H. Wilson Tang, Guillermo Torre‐Amione, Carsten Tschöpe

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisCannabidiolPlaceboHeart failureInternal medicineAcute myocarditisCardiologyRandomized controlled trialClinical endpointHeart transplantationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Acute myocarditis, although a rare disease, can be associated with sudden cardiac death or the need for transplantation in both children and young adults. To date, there is no definitive evidence to support the routine use of immunosuppressive therapy or treatment targeting inflammation in patients with myocarditis. Animal models of cardiovascular (CV), as well as neurological diseases, have demonstrated that cannabidiol has significant anti-inflammatory properties and may represent a promising therapy in acute myocarditis. This efficacy has been shown in a murine model of autoimmune myocarditis as well as in in vitro and in vivo models of heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We present the rationale and design of the ARCHER Trial, an international multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study examining the safety and efficacy of a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation, in patients with mild to moderate acute myocarditis. Eligible patients are those with acute myocarditis, randomized within 10 days of the diagnostic cardiac MRI (CMR), which has met defined diagnostic criteria for myocarditis. Oral treatment (cannabidiol or placebo) is titrated from 2.5 mg/kg of body weight up to 10 mg/kg of body weight b.i.d. (or highest tolerated dose) and taken for 12 weeks in addition to standard of care therapy for HF. The primary endpoints are defined as changes in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and extra cellular volume (ECV), measured by CMR at 12 weeks. Assuming 80% power, a 5% alpha risk and 25% missing CMR follow-up data at Week 12, 100 patients are required to demonstrate the desired treatment effect of 18%. The change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to Week 12 was selected as the secondary endpoint. Additional exploratory endpoints include changes in hs-troponin, NT-proBNP, markers of inflammation and endothelial function during the 12-week treatment period. The trial is ongoing but is now more than 50% recruited. As enrolment in the trial continues, no interim data are available for inclusion in this Design paper. CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing ARCHER Trial is an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study, designed to determine the effect of a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation on CMR parameters in patients presenting with acute myocarditis. Enrolment of 100 patients is expected to conclude in Q3 2024. Study results will be available in early 2025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207