GraspUI: Seamlessly Integrating Object-Centric Gestures within the Seven Phases of Grasping
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objects are indispensable tools in our daily lives. Recent research has demonstrated their potential to act as conduits for digital interactions with microgestures, however, the primary focus was on situations where the hand firmly grasps an object. We introduce GraspUI, an exploratory design space of object-centric gestures within the seven distinct phases of the grasping process, spanning pre-, during, and post-grasp movements. We conducted ideation sessions with mixed-reality designers from industry and academia to explore gesture integration throughout the entire grasping process. The outcome was 38 storyboards envisioning practical applications. To evaluate the design space’s utility, we performed a video-based assessment with end-users. We then implemented an interactive prototype and quantified the overhead cost of performing proposed gestures through a secondary study. Participants reacted positively to gestures and could integrate them into existing usage of objects. To conclude, we highlight technical and usability guidelines for implementing and extending GraspUI systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it