MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400142702 · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660731

Fidgets: Building Blocks for a Predictive UI Toolkit

2024· article· en· W4400142702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesigning Interactive Systems Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of AR platforms, combined with the rising predictive power of intelligent systems, will fundamentally change interactive computing. Interaction will increasingly happen on the go, causing I/O to become constrained, ultimately leading to reliance on user intent prediction for aid. In this pictorial, we argue that to support the development of such systems, new predictive UI toolkits are required. We place the reader in the shoes of an App designer and outline the challenges that will be faced. We then describe a new predictive toolkit, leveraging Fuzzy Widgets, or “Fidgets” as the main UI building block. Fidgets extend Responsive Design into the realm of intelligent systems, to adapt not only to spatial constraints, but to system predictions as well. We then describe a working implementation of a predictive music application, built using our described framework, showcasing its benefits and range of adaptive abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it