Design and development of solar parabolic concentrator, closed-loop pressurized hot water for a household baking system – For the case of injera baking in Ethiopia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A laboratory setup with two axis of manual sun-tracking was designed and built. To get the predicted values for a solar injera stove, a 20-min heating time to prepare it for baking, 3.1 kWh power in the first hour, and 5.8 kWh (with only an 87 percent increase) in the second hour were acquired to bake 9 and 28 injera using electric injera stove, respectively. The temperature distribution on the clay surface was the range of 180 °C–220 °C. Solar injera baking stove was designed and built using the average energy required to bake one injera from an electrical injera stove. The laboratory setup was put to the test, temperatures at the receiver's surface ranging from 315 to 318 °C and an average solar radiation of 1000 W/m2 was obtained on the first test. The injera stove inlet reached a maximum temperature of 180.92 °C with a pressure of 14.5 bars during a pressurized hot water production and circulation test (load test). The surface temperature of the solar injera stove clay plate reached a maximum of 62.69 °C. Temperature of more than 60 °C was maintained on the surface of the solar injera stove plate for nearly 2 h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".