MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400149140 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102947

Bifidobacterium longum Strains Modify a Nutrient Intervention for Stunting in Zimbabwean Infants

2024· article· en· W4400149140 on OpenAlexaff
Ethan Gough, Thaddeus J. Edens, Lynnea Carr, Ruairi C. Robertson, Kuda Mutasa, Robert Ntozini, Bernard Chasekwa, Hyun Min Geum, Iman Baharmand, Sandeep K. Gill, Batsirai Mutasa, Mduduzi N. N. Mbuya, Florence D. Majo, Naume D Tavengwa, Freddy Francis, Joice Tome, Ceri Evans, Margaret Kosek, Andrew J. Prendergast, Amee R. Manges

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Clair College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifidobacterium longumIntervention (counseling)NutrientBifidobacteriumEnvironmental healthMedicineBiologyFood scienceLactobacillusNursingEcologyFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Child stunting is a longstanding indicator of chronic undernutrition. However, it remains a prevalent public health problem. Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) have been widely tested to reduce stunting, but have largely had modest effects. The infant gut microbiome may be a key contributor to stunting; and mother and infant fucosyltransferase (FUT) phenotypes are important determinants of infant microbiome composition. We investigated whether mother-infant FUT status and infant gut microbiome composition modified the impact of an infant and young child feeding (IYCF) intervention, that included SQ-LNS, on stunting at age 18 months in the SHINE Trial in Zimbabwe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207