MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

State of cognitive functions in elderly and senile patients with arterial hypertension, depending on the presence of concomitant chronic kidney disease stage G3a and G3b

2024· article· en· W4400151903 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
О. Д. Остроумова, K. K. Dzamikhov, А. И. Кочетков, S. V. Batyukina, Т. М. Оstroumova, E. Yu. Ebzeyeva, А. Ю. Андрианов, V. B. Dashabylova

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology and Dialysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcomitantStage (stratigraphy)DiseaseMedicineKidneyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: the frequent combination (comorbidity) of arterial hypertension (AH) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), each of which is a risk factor for the development of cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia, determines the need to diagnose cognitive deficits in these multimorbid patients. Aims: to assess the impact of concomitant CKD and its stages on cognitive functions (CF) of elderly and senile patients with arterial hypertension. Materials and methods: 330 patients aged 60 years and older with essential АH were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence of CKD: group 1 - without concomitant CKD (n=110, mean age 76 [69.8; 82.3] years, 50 (45.5%) women), group 2 - patients with CKD stages G3a and G3b (n=220, mean age 81 [73; 85] years, 118 (53.6%) women). All the patients underwent the assessment of CF using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSЕ), Alzheimer&apos;s Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Trial Making Test (TMT), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Verbal Association Test (literal (letter) and categorical (animal) associations), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Word-Color Interference Test (Stroop color-word conflict test). Results: compared to patients without CKD, patients with CKD stage G3a and G3b had statistically significantly lower average final scores on the MoCA test (23 [21; 25] versus 24 [22; 26] points, respectively, p=0.005) and on the MMSE (27 [25; 29] versus 28 [25.8; 29] points, respectively, p=0.002), among them, patients who scored the lowest number of points on the MoCA test (10-17 points) (p=0.032) and the MMSE (20-24 points) (р<0.001). Patients with concomitant CKD stage G3a and G3b scored a statistically significantly higher number of points when testing according to ADAS-cog (14 [11;18] versus 11 [9; 15] points in the group without CKD, p<0.001), named fewer literal associations (11 [10]; 13] words versus 12 [11; 13], respectively, p<0.001), and had fewer correctly filled cells when performing the DSST test (20 [17; 23] versus 21.5 [19; 25], respectively, p<0.001). Patients with CKD G3b compared with patients with CKD G3a and without CKD had worse results when tested using the MoCА test, MMSE, and ADAS-cog. Conclusion: the results obtained indicate an unfavorable effect of concomitant CKD stage G3a and G3b on the CF of elderly and senile patients with arterial hypertension and a worsening of CF as the severity of CKD increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology and DialysisSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207