Two-level parallel load balancing strategy for accelerating DSMC simulations in near-continuum gases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) algorithm is widely employed for simulating rarefied gas flows and is increasingly applied in near-continuum regimes for research and engineering purposes. However, its computational demands, notably load imbalance and extended simulation time, hinder widespread adoption. Addressing these challenges, this paper introduces the Two-Level parallel load balancing strategy. This novel approach combines thread-level and multi-process parallelism to enhance load balancing and reduce simulation time. Key features include a thread-level load-decoupling strategy implemented via OpenMP and a multi-process load balancing mechanism employing distributed memory via MPI. Building upon our previous [Formula: see text] [L. Li, W. Ren and B. Zhang, J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aviat. Ser. A 46, 88 (2014)] approach, the load balancing mechanism utilizes Stop At Risk (SAR) criteria for repartitioning with METIS. Additionally, a specialized data transmission mechanism utilizing MPI nonblocking communication minimizes global communication between processes. Validation and evaluation are performed using four hypersonic flow cases around a cylinder and sphere, demonstrating significant improvements. Notably, the proposed strategy achieves [Formula: see text] enhancement over the [Formula: see text] strategy under 512 CPU cores compared to 16 CPU cores, and reduces between-process communication time with [Formula: see text]. These advancements contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of the DSMC algorithm in near-continuum aerodynamic simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".