Le Conseil supérieur de l’éducation sous Robert Bourassa (1970-1976) : une « machine à faire des rapports » ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, les années 1970 sont le théâtre de maintes crises sociales. Loin d’être épargné, le monde de l’éducation se retrouve au cœur de plusieurs débats, notamment ceux soulevés par la question de la déconfessionnalisation et l’enjeu de la protection du français. Il est aussi marqué par une radicalisation du discours syndical et par d’importantes grèves du personnel enseignant qui paralysent le système scolaire. Dans cet article, nous tâchons de comprendre comment le Conseil supérieur de l’éducation, un organisme de la Révolution tranquille emblématique d’un État-providence technocratique, s’est adapté, sous les deux mandats de Robert Bourassa, afin de mieux jouer son rôle de conseiller critique de l’État. Notre analyse montre une affirmation inédite de l’autonomie de l’organisme-conseil vis-à-vis du ministre et du ministère, mais aussi une difficulté à prendre part aux grands débats sociétaux en comparaison de dossiers plus circonscrits et pratiques. circonscrits et pratiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".