MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400163690 · doi:10.47413/vidya.v3i1.322

A REVIEW: ANTI-OXIDANT AND ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF SELECTED PLANTS

2024· article· en· W4400163690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVIDYA - A JOURNAL OF GUJARAT UNIVERSITY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnti oxidantChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBiochemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beneficial effect of medicinal plants generally derives from the secondary products found in the plant, although a mixture of the metabolites having multiples composites. The medicinal activity of plants is specific to a particular species or group of plants. A taxonomically distinct mixture of secondary metabolites exists within a particular plant. Plant screening typically requires many approaches; one of the common methods used to select the plant for pharmacological analysis. The antioxidant activity of medicinal plants is well known and utilized for several health benefits, including cardiovascular disease, cancer etc. The antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of different medicinal plants have been reviewed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it