MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400164199 · doi:10.1101/2024.06.28.601227

Dual RNA-seq study of the dynamics of coding and non-coding RNAs expression during <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection in a mouse model

2024· preprint· en· W4400164199 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Kreis, Claire Toffano‐Nioche, Cécile Denève-Larrazet, Jean‐Christophe Marvaud, Julian R. Garneau, Florent Dumont, Erwin L. van Dijk, Yan Jaszczyszyn, Anaïs Boutserin, Francesca D’Angelo, Daniel Gautheret, Imad Kansau, Claire Janoir, Olga Soutourina

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologymicroRNATranscriptomeGeneRNAVirulenceRNA-SeqNon-coding RNAGene expressionComputational biologyHost adaptationClostridioidesGeneticsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clostridioides difficile is the leading cause of healthcare associated diarrhoea in industrialized countries. Many questions remain to be answered about the mechanisms governing its interaction with the host during infection. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) contribute to shaping virulence in many pathogens and modulate host responses, however, their role in C. difficile infection (CDI) has not been explored. To better understand the dynamics of ncRNAs expression contributing to C. difficile infectious cycle and host response, we used a dual RNA- seq approach in a conventional murine model. From the pathogen side, this transcriptomic analysis revealed the upregulation of virulence factors, metabolism and sporulation genes, as well as the identification of 61 ncRNAs differentially expressed during infection that correlated with the analysis of available raw RNA-seq datasets from two independent studies. From these data we identified 118 potential new transcripts in C. difficile including 106 new ncRNA genes. From the host side, we observed the induction of several pro-inflammatory pathways and, among the 185 differentially expressed ncRNAs, the overexpression of microRNAs (miRNAs) previously associated to inflammatory responses or unknown long ncRNAs and miRNAs. A particular host gene expression profile could be associated to the symptomatic infection. In accordance, the metatranscriptomic analysis revealed specific microbiota changes accompanying CDI and specific species associated with symptomatic infection in mice. This first adaptation of in vivo dual RNA-seq to C. difficile contributes to unravelling the regulatory networks involved in C. difficile infectious cycle and host response and provides valuable resources for further studies of RNA-based mechanisms during CDI. Importance Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of nosocomial infections associated with antibiotic therapy classified as an urgent antibiotic resistance threat. This pathogen interacts with host and gut microbial communities during infection, but the mechanisms of these interactions remain largely to be uncovered. Noncoding RNAs contribute to bacterial virulence and host responses, but their expression has not been explored during C. difficile infection. We took advantage of the conventional mouse model of C. difficile infection to look simultaneously to the dynamics of gene expression in pathogen, its host and gut microbiota composition providing valuable resources for future studies. We identified a number of ncRNAs that could mediate the adaptation of C. difficile inside the host and the crosstalk with the host immune response. Promising inflammation markers and potential therapeutic targets emerged from this work open new directions for RNA-based and microbiota-modulatory strategies to improve the efficiency of C. difficile infection treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→