Body‐Integrated Ultrasensitive All‐Textile Pressure Sensors for Skin‐Inspired Artificial Sensory Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tactile sensing plays a vital role in human somatosensory perception as it provides essential touch information necessary for interacting with the environment and accomplishing daily tasks. The progress in textile electronics has opened up opportunities for developing intelligent wearable devices that enable somatosensory perception and interaction. Herein, a skin‐inspired all‐textile pressure sensor (ATP) is presented that emulates the sensing and interaction functions of human skin, offering wearability, comfort, and breathability. The ATP demonstrates impressive features, including ultrahigh sensitivity (1.46 × 10 6 kPa −1 ), fast response time (1 ms), excellent stability and durability (over 2000 compression‐release cycles), a low detection limit of 10 Pa, and remarkable breathability (93.2%). The multipixel array of ATPs has been proven to facilitate static and dynamic mapping of spatial pressure, as well as pressure trajectory monitoring functions. Moreover, by integrating ATP with oscillation circuits, external force stimuli can be directly encoded into digital frequency pulses that resemble human physiological signals. The frequency of output pulses increases with the applied pressure. Consequently, an ATP‐based artificial sensory system is constructed for intelligent tactile perception. This work provides a simple and versatile strategy for practical applications of wearable electronics in the fields of robotics, sports science, and human–machine interfaces technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".