MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400173556 · doi:10.1142/s1793525324500249

Topological four-manifolds with right-angled Artin fundamental groups: Corrigendum

2024· erratum· en· W4400173556 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian Hambleton, Alyson Hildum

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Topology and Analysis · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCobordismMathematicsFundamental groupDimension (graph theory)Upper and lower boundsGroup (periodic table)Topology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We correct the stability bound in our classification of closed, [Formula: see text], topological four-manifolds with fundamental group [Formula: see text] of cohomological dimension [Formula: see text] (up to [Formula: see text]-cobordism), after stabilization by connected sum with copies of [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text] is a right-angled Artin group whose defining graphs have no four-cliques, then the new stability bound is [Formula: see text]. The other results of the paper are not affected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Topology and AnalysisSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207