MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400176249 · doi:10.1787/f0cf6d36-en

Place-responsive higher education institutions as policy partners

2023· book-chapter· en· W4400176249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD skills studies · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaNexus (standard)Christian ministryEntrepreneurshipBusinessInvestment (military)Social innovationSocial capitalHigher educationEconomic geographyRegional scienceEconomic systemEconomic growthPolitical sciencePublic relationsEconomicsSociologyGeographyFinanceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Québec research and innovation investment strategy (SQRI 2) supports the role of HEIs as drivers of provincial innovation and entrepreneurship. This depends on a commitment to focus on talent and the ambition to stimulate entrepreneurship and innovation. The Innovation Zones established by the Ministry of Economy, Innovation and Energy (MEIE) also help connect various actors, including HEIs, to generate innovation and social capital in both metropolitan and non-metropolitan Québec. This chapter discusses the provincial innovation strategy and illustrates the nexus between research and local innovation within Innovation Zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD skills studiesSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207