MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400179057 · doi:10.1627/jpi.67.136

Improvement of Liquid Hydrocarbon Yield in CO<sub>2</sub> Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis over Potassium-added Iron Carbide Catalyst

2024· article· en· W4400179057 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Akihide Yanagita, Shingo FURUYA, Haruki HORIKOSHI, Keigo Tashiro, Shigeo Satokawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Petroleum Institute · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHokkaido UniversityCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

フィッシャー · トロプシュ合成(Fischer–Tropsch synthesis; FTS)を経由したCO2水素化反応(CO2-FTS)による液体炭化水素(C5+)の効率的な合成を目指し,炭化鉄触媒(FeCx)へのカリウム添加効果を調べた。シュウ酸鉄二水和物に硝酸カリウムを加えCOガス流通下で熱分解することで,カリウム含有量の異なる炭化鉄触媒(K–FeCx)を調製した。K(z)–FeCx触媒(K/Fe=z/100,z=0, 1, 5, 10: モル比)上でのCO2-FTS試験によって得られたC5+,others収率とCH4収率を比較した。K(1)–FeCx触媒を用いた場合は比較した触媒の中で最も高いC5+,others収率が得られた。さらに,K(1)–FeCx触媒はカリウムを含まない触媒に比べて副生するCH4の収率が低くなった。K(1)–FeCx触媒はFTS反応の活性点であるχ-Fe5C2相を最も多く含んでいるとともに,過剰にカリウムを加えた触媒と比べてカリウム自身によるFTS活性点の被覆が少ないため,液体炭化水素収率が向上したと考えた。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japan Petroleum InstituteSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207