Vibrational Electronic-Thermofield Coupled Cluster (VE-TFCC) Theory for Quantum Simulations of Vibronic Coupling Systems at Thermal Equilibrium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A vibrational electronic-thermofield coupled cluster (VE-TFCC) approach is developed to calculate thermal properties of non-adiabatic vibronic coupling systems. The thermofield (TF) theory and a mixed linear exponential ansatz based on second-quantized Bosonic construction operators are introduced to propagate the thermal density operator as a “pure state” in the Bogoliubov representation. Through this compact representation of the thermal density operator, the approach is basis-set-free and scales classically (polynomial) as the number of degrees of freedoms (DoF) in the system increases. The VE-TFCC approach is benchmarked with small test models and a real molecular compound (CoF 4 – anion) against the conventional sum over states (SOS) method and applied to calculate thermochemistry properties of a gas-phase reaction: CoF 3 + F – → CoF 4 – . Results shows that the VE-TFCC approach, in conjunction with vibronic models, provides an effective protocol for calculating thermodynamic properties of vibronic coupling systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".