An ontology for automated fault detection & diagnostics of HVAC using BIM and machine learning concepts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an ontology for AFDD (Automated Fault Detection and Diagnostics) of HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air conditioning) systems in buildings called “AFDDOnto”. Presently, the AFDD models are mainly data-centric and often lack semantic information such as contextual information and spatial information; additionally, configuration information, analysis, and results used for model development are lost once developed. This impedes an effective mechanism for tracking changes and updating the model for future developments and use cases. The Proposed ontology can be used for AFDD model development, tracking changes, analytics, visualization, and digital twinning by enabling integration of BIM with BAS/BMS (Building Automation System/Building Management System) concepts and secondly to store AFDD configuration and analytics in the AFDDOnto. Select competency questions are constructed using SPARQL queries to access the proposed knowledge model. The proposed ontology has been tested against different measures using multiple metrics and a case study and further validated using a semi-structured survey of experts. Applied AI engineers, Facility managers, Asset managers, and building owners aiming to develop AFDD models for HVAC systems can benefit from adopting this ontology for HVAC maintenance, including analysis, model development, and knowledge management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".