Electromagnets Under the Table: An Unobtrusive Magnetic Navigation System for Microsurgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Miniature magnetic tools have the potential to enable minimally invasive surgical techniques to be applied to space-restricted surgical procedures in areas such as neurosurgery. However, typical magnetic navigation systems, which create the magnetic fields to drive such tools, either cannot generate large enough fields, or surround the patient in a way that obstructs surgeon access to the patient. This paper introduces the design of a magnetic navigation system with eight electromagnets arranged completely under the operating table, to endow the system with maximal workspace accessibility, which allows the patient to lie down on the top surface of the system without any constraints. The found geometric layout of the electromagnets maximizes the field strength and uniformity over a reasonable neurosurgical operating volume. The system can generate non-uniform magnetic fields up to 38 mT along the x and y axes and 47 mT along the z axis at a working distance of 120 mm away from the actuation system workbench, deep enough to deploy magnetic microsurgical tools in the brain. The forces which can be exerted on millimeter-scale magnets used in prototype neurosurgical tools are validated experimentally. Due to its large workspace, this system could be used to control milli-robots in a variety of surgical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it