MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400192902 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-bsg.180

P98 Efficacy and safety of 4 years of continuous ozanimod treatment: an interim analysis of the true north open-label extension study

2024· article· en· W4400192902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterimExtension (predicate logic)MedicineComputer scienceSafety profileInterim analysisInternal medicineClinical trialAdverse effectProgramming languagePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> The phase 3 True North (TN) study (NCT02435992) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod (OZA) over 52 wk in patients (pts) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This interim analysis of the ongoing TN open-label extension (OLE; NCT02531126) assessed pts with up to ~4 y of OZA treatment. <h3>Methods</h3> Pts in clinical response at Week (W) 52 of OZA treatment during TN who subsequently entered the OLE were analyzed up to OLE W142, representing up to ~4 y of continuous OZA treatment. Symptomatic response and symptomatic remission were evaluated from OLE W5 through OLE W142. Clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, and corticosteroid (CS)-free remission were evaluated at OLE W46, W94, and W142. Adverse events were monitored throughout TN and the OLE. <h3>Results</h3> In all, 131 pts entered the OLE after achieving clinical response on OZA at TN W52. At data cutoff, 64.1% completed OLE W142. Symptomatic response and symptomatic remission were observed in 100.0% and 84.4% of pts, respectively, at OLE W5 in observed case (OC) analyses (93.1% and 78.6%, respectively, in nonresponder imputation [NRI] analyses). By OLE W142, symptomatic response and symptomatic remission rates were 98.7% and 88.3%, respectively, in OC analyses (58.0% and 51.9%, respectively, in NRI analyses). Clinical and endoscopic endpoints are shown in figure 1. Of note, 65.3% of TN W52 clinical responders achieved clinical remission and CS-free remission at OLE W142 (OC analyses; 35.9% in NRI analyses). In the last year of follow-up in the OLE, there were no new bradycardia, third-degree atrioventricular block, hypertension, herpes zoster, or macular edema cases, and no clinically meaningful change in malignancy rates. No serious hepatic events occurred. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Clinical responders after 1 y on OZA sustained response for an additional 3 y and achieved clinical remission with continuous OZA exposure. OZA is a well-tolerated, durable therapy for pts with UC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it