Movimento III. Rigenerazioni, passaggi, transcodifiche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the third and last issue devoted to the interdisciplinary space-time notion (and image) of ‘movement’, we explore the concept and phenomenology of ‘regeneration’. After defining the notion’s prospective-and-cognitive nature as a shared modelling of experience and the weaving of its discursive and textual dimension, we focus on that subtle, intricate and sometimes broken geometry which gives shape to textual, representative and socio-cultural processes of crystallization, transmission, evolution, survival and regeneration within an increasingly complex ecosystem, which includes (and often mingles) film, TV, literature, music, fashion, art, and various other entertainment practices. Based on a deep interrelation between communicative surfaces and models of cultural production and consumption, and surrounded by the more and more elastic and permeable boundaries of present-day communicative genres and creative codes, regeneration therefore appears as key to a ceaseless movement that keeps the objects of our culture, as we know them, in a state of presence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".