MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400199056 · doi:10.4324/9781003554073-9

From Communal Ritual to Royal Spectacle: Some Observations on the Staging of Royal Entries (1450–1600)1

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400199056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lawrence M. Bryant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleHistoryAncient historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professors Nicolas Russell and Hélène Visentin’s excellent introduction to the seven articles in this collection, ‘The Multilayered Production of Meaning in Sixteenth-Century French Ceremonial Entries,’ leaves little to say about each article’s specific topic. These articles, along with the productions of the Canadian Groupe de Recherche sur les Entrées Solennelles (GRES) and other recent studies and bibliographies, indicate that the Renaissance entry has secured its essential place in the study of French culture and politics. 2 On the one hand, from medieval processions and ceremonies and Renaissance imitations and adaptations of classical styles and practices, we see that entries served as a sort of sixteenth-century equivalent to modern expositions, such as twentieth-century world fairs, that seek to display cultural, intellectual, and political aspirations, if not actual accomplishments. On the other hand, we discover the sixteenth-century French people’s vastly different and exotic ways of conceptualizing and representing their world from those ways and worlds which we know. Particularly under the influence of printing and the rise of the book, the records of the entry are recalibrated so that the entry’s original concentration on hierarchical listings of the ranks and status of participants in processions with kings is greatly outweighed by the decorative programs, artistic displays, and propaganda surrounding (and overshadowing) the traditional processional core. In considering the great variety of subjects covered in this collection, Professors Russell and Visentin view the ‘entry’ as a singular form and established practice that over time developed in its ‘tripartite nature as a rite, an event, and a text.’ Since most of the articles in the collection look at the aspects of events or texts, we find little attention being given to the oldest and foundational part of entries, their rituals, from which various entries into cities gave rise to a kingdom-wide French royal entry tradition. I deeply appreciate the opportunity the editors have given me to contribute to this collection, which I do by first exploring some fifteenth-century factors that secured royal entries as a popular historical and royal practice, that is, the ritual core of the communal procession from the city to greet the ruler and the king and his entourage’s progress through the city to the major church or cathedral. By using this processional ritual as a point of departure, I look at the articles of this collection in a new light, one that sees the rise of a royal aesthetic and the printed program books as signs of the sixteenth-century dislocation of the entry’s original base in popular and communal ritual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.013
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207