Hannah T urner . Cataloguing Culture: Legacies of Colonialism in Museum Documentation Vancouver/Toronto, University of British Columbia Press, 2020, 243 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet entretien avec Baptiste Moutaud et Anthony Stavrianakis, anthropologues travaillant dans le domaine de la santé, Jessica de Largy Healy et Monica Heintz questionnent leur expérience internationale des comités d’éthique de la recherche, dans un contexte où les codes, institutions et protocoles éthiques nés dans le milieu anglo-saxon arrivent massivement en Europe et aussi dans la recherche anthropologique française. En réfléchissant collectivement aux enjeux, dilemmes posés et autres impératifs éthiques propres à leur champ d’étude auprès de patients et de personnel médical, Baptiste Moutaud et Anthony Stavrianakis réinterrogent les contours méthodologiques, scientifiques, déontologiques et légaux de la recherche contemporaine en anthropologie plus généralement. Dans cet entretien la notion de partage de savoirs entre chercheur et interlocuteurs est colorée par les conditions propres au champ de l’anthropologie de la santé, alors que celle de transparence dévoile des tenants institutionnels potentiellement contraires à son intention d’origine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".