MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400209946 · doi:10.4324/9781003499787-2

Growing Together

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400209946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rupa Banerjee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the evolving dynamics of Indian immigration to Canada, delving into historical contexts, changing immigration policies, and the profile of Indian immigrants. It highlights the shift from predominantly family-sponsored immigrants to those selected based on merit and skill, particularly through pathways like the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) and Canadian Experience Class (CEC). The influx of Indian international students and their subsequent transition to permanent residency is a notable trend, aided by policies such as the Post-Graduate Work Permit (PGWP) and the Express Entry system. The chapter analyzes socio-demographic changes among Indian immigrants, including education levels, language proficiency, intended occupations, and settlement patterns. It also explores factors driving Indian migration to Canada, encompassing India’s demographics, economic development, challenges in the Indian job market, and changes in US immigration policies. Finally, the chapter suggests future research directions, including the impact of this significant influx on ethnic entrepreneurship and public attitudes toward immigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4270.270

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207