Ensemble learning of decomposition-based machine learning models for multistep-ahead daily streamflow forecasting in northwest China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate daily streamflow forecasts remain challenging in arid regions. A Bayesian model averaging (BMA) ensemble learning strategy was proposed to forecast 1-, 2-, and 3-day-ahead streamflow in Dunhuang Oasis, northwest China. The efficiency of BMA was compared with four decomposition-based machine learning and deep learning models. Satisfactory forecasts were achieved with all proposed models at all lead times; however, based on Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values of 0.976, 0.967, and 0.957, BMA achieved the greatest accuracy for 1-, 2-, and 3-day-ahead streamflow forecasts, respectively. Uncertainty analysis confirmed the reliability of BMA in yielding consistently accurate streamflow forecasts. Thus, BMA could provide an efficient alternative approach to multistep-ahead daily streamflow forecasting. The incorporation of data decomposition techniques (e.g. variational mode decomposition) and deep learning algorithms (e.g. deep belief network) into BMA may provide worthy technical references for supervised learning of streamflow systems in data-scarce regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it