MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400217994 · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1360548

Explainable coronary artery disease prediction model based on AutoGluon from AutoML framework

2024· article· en· W4400217994 on OpenAlexaff
Jianghong Wang, Qiang Xue, Wenjun Zhang, Kelvin K. L. Wong, Zhihua Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyDiseaseMedicineInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study focuses on the innovative application of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) technology in cardiovascular medicine to construct an explainable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) prediction model to support the clinical diagnosis of CAD. Methods: This study utilizes a combined data set of five public data sets related to CAD. An ensemble model is constructed using the AutoML open-source framework AutoGluon to evaluate the feasibility of AutoML in constructing a disease prediction model in cardiovascular medicine. The performance of the ensemble model is compared against individual baseline models. Finally, the disease prediction ensemble model is explained using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The experimental results show that the AutoGluon-based ensemble model performs better than the individual baseline models in predicting CAD. It achieved an accuracy of 0.9167 and an AUC of 0.9562 in 4-fold cross-bagging. SHAP measures the importance of each feature to the prediction of the model and explains the prediction results of the model. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of AutoML technology in cardiovascular medicine and highlights its potential in disease prediction. AutoML reduces the barriers to model building and significantly improves prediction accuracy. Additionally, the integration of SHAP enhances model transparency and explainability, which is critical to ensuring model credibility and widespread adoption in cardiovascular medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207