MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400220372 · doi:10.26512/lc29202348109

Narrativas nas práticas pedagógicas no ambiente universitário

2023· article· pt· W4400220372 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐Claude Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueLinhas Crí­ticas · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyMathematics educationEpistemologyPhilosophyPsychologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo discute o interesse pelo uso de formas de narrativas na educação em ambiente universitário. São apresentadas três atividades educacionais implementadas com três grupos diferentes de estudantes de Québec: narrativas de apresentação de si, narrativas de percurso e narrativas de experiência. A abordagem reflexiva e a análise dos resultados mostram a contribuição dessas formas de narrativas na formação. Alguns limites são identificados, assim como são sugeridos alguns caminhos a serem explorados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinhas Crí­ticasSame topicDigital Storytelling and EducationFrench-language works237,207