MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400220372 · doi:10.26512/lc29202348109

Narrativas nas práticas pedagógicas no ambiente universitário

2023· article· pt· W4400220372 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐Claude Bernard

Bibliographic record

VenueLinhas Crí­ticas · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyMathematics educationEpistemologyPhilosophyPsychologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo discute o interesse pelo uso de formas de narrativas na educação em ambiente universitário. São apresentadas três atividades educacionais implementadas com três grupos diferentes de estudantes de Québec: narrativas de apresentação de si, narrativas de percurso e narrativas de experiência. A abordagem reflexiva e a análise dos resultados mostram a contribuição dessas formas de narrativas na formação. Alguns limites são identificados, assim como são sugeridos alguns caminhos a serem explorados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.124

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinhas Crí­ticasSame topicDigital Storytelling and EducationFrench-language works237,207