Ancient Grasshoppers: A revision of the genus Bullacris (Orthoptera: Pneumoridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genus Bullacris in the family Pneumoridae was most recently revised by Dirsh in 1965 based on morphological comparisons between species. However, since that time, new information about the genus and the family has come to light, necessitating a revision of the genus. In addition, the species B. boschimana was originally described based on a single female specimen. Here we present and describe the male of the species for the first time. The aim of this study was to update the current species descriptions by including additional specimens and incorporating additional methods for a more comprehensive comparison. Analyses consisted of morphometric measurements from high-quality images of type specimens, existing South African museum specimens, as well as personally collected specimens. Acoustic signals are also presented and compared between species. In addition, phylogenetic analyses were conducted on the barcoding mitochondrial gene COI and two nuclear genes, namely ITS and 18S. Results show that according to morphological, acoustic and genetic data, B. discolor and B. serrata as well as B. intermedia and B. membracioides share notable similarities. Bullacris discolor and B. serrata share similar phenotypic traits, in which B. discolor can either appear uniform in colour or have a speckled variation that is very similar in appearance to B. serrata. Bullacris intermedia and B. membracioides have a 5% mitochondrial DNA pairwise distance, suggesting that they may have not be fully diverged; however, morphological analysis shows that these species are morphologically distinguishable. It is suggested that these species may have undergone spatial separation at one point; however, further investigation is required. Additional sampling across a wider geographic range is essential to clarify the relationships between B. discolor and B. serrata, as well as between B. intermedia and B. membracioides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".