MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400221856 · doi:10.7416/ai.2024.2629

Why are rare diseases underdiagnosed? A clinical management study on detection of primary biliary cholangitis in primary care.

2024· article· en· W4400221856 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Donato, Marie Graciella Pigozzi, Giulia Colarieti, Marco Festa, Erminio Tabaglio

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary careMedicinePrimary sclerosing cholangitisInternal medicinePrimary (astronomy)GastroenterologyGeneral surgeryFamily medicineDiseasePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There are about 7,000 rare diseases that affect 10% of the world population. Primary biliary cholangitis, an autoimmune chronic liver disease of the interlobular bile ducts, is one of the most common causes of chronic cholestasis. However, it is a rare, often underdiagnosed and undertreated, disease which can lead to cirrhosis and liver failure. We aimed to assess the proportion of undetected primary biliary cholangitis patients in primary care through a clinical management process. Methods: We made two extractions of the clinical data concerning liver diseases, risk factors and laboratory tests from the databases of a sample of general practitioners, with a check and correction of mistakes. The clinical data of the patients without liver disease and major risk factors, and with serum Alkaline Phosphatase above the laboratory reference values, were re-evaluated by each general practitioner with an expert gastroenterologist. The patients with elevated Alkaline Phosphatase values and without evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic causes of cholestasis were considered suspected for primary biliary cholangitis and assessed for antimitochondrial antibodies test and specialist' s evaluation, according to present guidelines. Results: A total of 20,480 adults attending 14 general practitioners in the province of Brescia, Northern Italy, were included in the study. Nine patients had a prior primary biliary cholangitis diagnosis, with a prevalence of 43.9/100000. After excluding 2094 (10.2%) patient with liver diseases or other causes of cholestasis, 121 subjects with Alkaline Phosphatase above the reference values were re-evaluated by the general practitioners and gastroenterologist, and 27 patients without symptoms or signs of cholestasis were considered suspected for primary biliary cholangitis: 9 of them were tested for antimitochondrial antibodies, and three new primary biliary cholangitis cases were detected (+33%). Discussion and Conclusions: This study shows that there is a not negligible burden of undetected cases of adult rare diseases that can be diagnosed in primary care, through a disease management procedure, without modifying the routine clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207