Symmetry breaking of fluorophore binding to a G-quadruplex generates an RNA aptamer with picomolar <i>KD</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorogenic RNA aptamer tags with high affinity enable RNA purification and imaging. The G-quadruplex (G4) based Mango (M) series of aptamers were selected to bind a thiazole orange based (TO1-Biotin) ligand. Using a chemical biology and reselection approach, we have produced a MII.2 aptamer-ligand complex with a remarkable set of properties: Its unprecedented KD of 45 pM, formaldehyde resistance (8% v/v), temperature stability and ligand photo-recycling properties are all unusual to find simultaneously within a small RNA tag. Crystal structures demonstrate how MII.2, which differs from MII by a single A23U mutation, and modification of the TO1-Biotin ligand to TO1-6A-Biotin achieves these results. MII binds TO1-Biotin heterogeneously via a G4 surface that is surrounded by a stadium of five adenosines. Breaking this pseudo-rotational symmetry results in a highly cooperative and homogeneous ligand binding pocket: A22 of the G4 stadium stacks on the G4 binding surface while the TO1-6A-Biotin ligand completely fills the remaining three quadrants of the G4 ligand binding face. Similar optimization attempts with MIII.1, which already binds TO1-Biotin in a homogeneous manner, did not produce such marked improvements. We use the novel features of the MII.2 complex to demonstrate a powerful optically-based RNA purification system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".