MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400223098 · doi:10.14740/jcgo970

Rare Fetal Case of Absent Ductus Venosus With Extrahepatic Drainage Into the Coronary Sinus

2024· article· en· W4400223098 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicole Seyfried, Yevgenia Y. Fomina, M. K. Gaitonde, Rafaël Lévy, Elaine L. Duryea

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuctus venosusSinus venosusCoronary sinusFetusCardiologyInternal medicineSinus (botany)Pregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Absent ductus venosus (ADV) is a rare anomaly that is often associated with significant fetal anomalies and chromosomal aneuploidies. Prognosis depends on the pattern of drainage of the umbilical vein and the associated anomalies. The ductus venosus carries oxygenated blood from the umbilical vein to the inferior vena cava and prevents fetal high output heart failure by providing a resistor against placental blood flow. This case demonstrates echocardiographic delineation of a rare variant of ADV, with extrahepatic drainage from the left superior vena cava into the coronary sinus. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2024;13(2):54-57 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo970

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicVascular anomalies and interventionsFrench-language works237,207