MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400229432 · doi:10.3390/biom14070785

Exploring the Antiangiogenic and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Homoisoflavonoids: Target Identification Using Biotin Probes

2024· review· en· W4400229432 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Fei, Sangil Kwon, Jin‐Young Jang, Minyoung Seo, Seongwon Yu, Timothy W. Corson, Seung‐Yong Seo

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomolecules · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Eye InstituteNational Research Foundation of KoreaKorea Health Industry Development InstituteNational Research Foundation
KeywordsBiotinProteomicsBiochemistryChemistryComputational biologyIdentification (biology)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical proteomics using biotin probes of natural products have significantly advanced our understanding of molecular targets and therapeutic potential. This review highlights recent progress in the application of biotin probes of homoisoflavonoids for identifying binding proteins and elucidating mechanisms of action. Notably, homoisoflavonoids exhibit antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic effects. A combination of biotin probes, pull-down assays, mass spectrometry, and molecular modeling has revealed how natural products and their derivatives interact with several proteins such as ferrochelatase (FECH), soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 (IMPDH2), phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), and deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH). These target identification approaches pave the way for new therapeutic avenues, especially in the fields of oncology and ophthalmology. Future research aimed at expanding the repertoire of target identification using biotin probes of homoisoflavonoids promises to further elucidate the complex mechanisms and develop new drug candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomoleculesSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207