MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spiking Auto-Encoder Using Error Modulated Spike Timing Dependant Plasticity

2024· article· en· W4400230130 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Walters, Zhengyu Cai, Hamid Rahimian Kalatehbali, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Roman Genov, Jason K. Eshraghian, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpike (software development)Computer scienceEncoderSpike-timing-dependent plasticitySpeech recognitionAlgorithmSynaptic plasticity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Auto-encoders are capable of performing input re-construction through an encoder-decoder structure. These net-works can serve many purposes such as noise removal and anomaly detection, whilst being trained without the need for labelled data. Spiking auto-encoders can utilise asynchronous spikes to potentially improve power and simplify the required hardware. In this work, we propose an efficient spiking auto-encoder with novel error-modulated STDP learning. Our auto-encoder uses the Time To First Spike (TTFS) encoding scheme and needs to update all synaptic weights only once per input. Also, it needs only an average of 8 spikes in its hidden layer for reconstruction, leading to a very sparse and hence potentially power-efficient implementation. We demonstrate decent reconstruction ability for MNIST and the challenging Caltech Face/Motorbike datasets and achieve excellent noise removal from MNIST images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207