MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400231664 · doi:10.7759/cureus.63693

Disseminated Nocardia cyriacigeorgica Infection Disguised as a Metastatic Adrenal Gland Malignancy in a Healthy Patient

2024· article· en· W4400231664 on OpenAlexaff
Mathew Daniel, Sadik Salman, Benjamin Adam

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicActinomycetales infections and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalignancyNocardiaMedicineAdrenal glandPathologyBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nocardia, typically recognized as an uncommon opportunistic pathogen affecting immunocompromised individuals, has also been documented in various case reports involving infections in immunocompetent hosts. Transmission occurs through inhalation or inoculation into compromised skin. Subsequently, it can lead to disseminated infection via hematogenous spread, affecting nearly any organ with a particular affinity for the central nervous system. Dissemination to the adrenal glands is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported. In this report, we present a rare case of disseminated Nocardia cyriacigeorgica, initially resembling a metastatic adrenal gland malignancy in an otherwise healthy individual. The patient presented with non-specific symptoms, had multiple sets of negative blood cultures, clinical findings suggestive of an underlying adrenal gland malignancy, and lacked identifiable risk factors for Nocardia, creating a significant diagnostic challenge. Additionally, we review the existing literature on nocardiosis involving the adrenal glands. This case marks the third reported instance of a Nocardia cyriacigeorgica adrenal gland abscess in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicActinomycetales infections and treatmentFrench-language works237,207