MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SAR-MemPipe: A Hybrid Pipeline-SAR Memristive ADC for Analog Resistive Arrays

2024· article· en· W4400234622 on OpenAlexaff
Hao You, Jianxiong Xu, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuccessive approximation ADCPipeline (software)Resistive touchscreenComputer scienceSynthetic aperture radarElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringCapacitorEngineeringComputer visionVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hybrid pipeline SAR ADC with a loop-unrolled structure to reduce the crossbar’s ADC power while maintaining high speed. The 1ststage memristive SAR ADC can fully utilize the TIA originally in the crossbar and avoid the extra MDAC in pipeline ADC. Further, memristive weight calibration and a new resistive alternated binary search are implemented on the 1ststage to maintain the TIA gain and ADC’s accuracy. Both stage’s ADC are loop-unroll to eliminate the delay brought by SAR logic for high speed. Through multiple simulations, the design is demonstrated to be robust to the frequency and mismatch variations with the highest sampling frequency reaching 300MHz and SNDR up to 65.1dB in 9MHz input. The power consumption is designed to be as low as 6.7mW, which helps the ADC to achieve a 15.2fJ/conv FoM. Not limited to the crossbar, the presented ADC also shows promising potential for applications in various fields (biomedical, IoT etc.) for general purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207