MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400234983 · doi:10.11159/iccste24.140

Changes in the Water Footprint during COVID-19 at Santa Rosa Hospital Located In Metropolitan Lima City, Peru

2024· article· en· W4400234983 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wilfredo Salas Cáceres, Leslie Yañe Maxi, Karena Quiroz Jiménez

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFootprintMetropolitan areaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeographySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ArchaeologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate the water footprint of Santa Rosa Hospital, situated in the city of Lima, Peru.The analysis period covers the years 2015 to 2019, before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the period from 2020 to 2022, after the COVID-19 pandemic.The primary objective is to understand how the health crisis has impacted water consumption and to identify measures taken to optimize its usage.The methodology involves the calculation of both blue and grey water footprints, with the green footprint excluded due to the absence of green areas in the hospital premises.Data essential for determining the water footprint were sourced from technical reports published by public scientific entities.The findings revealed an increase in the water footprint following the onset of COVID-19.A management study implemented significant savings for the year 2022.Through this analysis, the hospital aims to reinforce its commitment to sustainable water management, contributing to a healthier and more environmentally sustainable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207